3.
14
vessel, and was therefore in Chinese territory". On 22nd
June the Magistrate held that the appellant was not a national
of China and that the Extradition proceedings therefore failed.
The appellant was thereupon rearrested, and his trial
for the murder of Captain Campbell began on 23rd August
before the Chief Justice. His counsel submitted that
as the crime charged was committed on board an armed Chinose
vessel the Supreme Court of Hong Kong had no jurisdiction.
At the close of the case for the Crown, when the necessary
facts had been established in evidence, the point was fully
argued, and the learned trial judge held that he had jurisdiction
to try the appellant who, on 24 th August, was found guilty and
sentenced to death.
On 31st August, 1937, the appellant appealed on a
question of law alone, alleging that the Court which tried
him had no jurisdiction.
The question has been very fully and ably argued before
this Court.
Mr. Macnamara's argument falls under three main heads:-
(a) that, the indictment chaging murder at common
law, the Court had no jurisdiction, common law
jurisdiction being purely territorial;
(b) that the immunity enjoyed by a public armed
vessel of a visiting state is enjoyed equally
by every member of the crew of that vessel:
that the courts and proper authorities of the
visiting state have sole jurisdiction with
regard to offences committed on board such a
vessel, and that the receiving state has no
jurisdiction; and
(c) that the immunity so conferred cannot be
waived, or alternatively that in the present
case there has been no valid and effectual
waiver.
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.